|
|
|
2014 Men's World Cup. |
Post Reply | Page <1 16171819> |
Author | |||||
ocvillager
Gold Member Joined: 07/06/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1531 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
both of these 2 players are not just good but great and excellent. U dont have to take side of any of them because if any of us can play just 5% as them, you could be very good at our club already.
After I watched their matches including with Timo Boll...then I went back to watch matches at our club tournament that most of the matches are 2400-2600 level. Seriously, I feel funny because what s a difference. These 2400-2600 players form look not flaw and just not entertaining as we just watched the world class. So stop saying who s better. Those 2 are close friends and each of them can win each other at any given day and time. After this match, the ratio is 7-4 to MALONG. That does not say ML is better or by winning WC, ZK is better. The truth is ML now aday plays much better against non-Chinese players at any day. He might have difficulty playing against pip and chopper but he will manage to win. ZK is like FD. They play much better against their own teammates because they are familiar with their games and strategy so well. THat can tell you that ZK and FD can flick from receiving service from any teammates but not to sometime a simple serve from other foreign players.
|
|||||
Sponsored Links | |||||
AJay
Super Member Joined: 05/31/2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 184 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
+1 ZJK was caught flat-footed or wrong-footed numerous times. In the past, I think he would have muscled it out. Also, I didn t see him do any of those amazing bounces in between points. On the one hand, it shows how dangerous he is as an opponent. Even without being 100% he knows how to pick his spots and out-smart you. Back him into a corner, he will show you a different game that you can t handle. On the other, the biggest obstacle for ZJK is his injuries. At some point certain treatments stop being effective and do more harm than good. From now on, I am not sure if ZJK can actually get any better in physical terms. Therefore I also agree it is a tall order for him to win another grand-slam title. In fact, he won t waste any efforts to win another Pro Tour or even World Cup. |
|||||
JacekGM
Platinum Member Joined: 02/17/2013 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 2356 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Again, I doubt ML or ZJK will go to the next Olympic singles... XX and FZD are much more likely.
|
|||||
(1) Juic SBA (Fl, 85 g) with Bluefire JP3 (red max) on FH and 0.6 mm DR N Desperado on BH; (2) Yinhe T7 (Fl, 87 g) with Bluefire M3 (red 2.0) on FH and 0.6 mm 755 on BH.
|
|||||
mrdoodzki
Gold Member Joined: 06/10/2011 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 1279 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
zhang jike s celebration is making its way to mainstream media. it s in yahoo usa
https://gma.yahoo.com/table-tennis-star-zhang-jikes-victory-celebration-costs-171746048--abc-news-entertainment.html |
|||||
Blade -- Stiga Clipper
FH -- DHS Hurricane 3 BH -- Japtec Experience HAPPINESS is....sometimes no words, just the sound of a ball |
|||||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Thank you. I appreciate your feedback. Before I go in depth as to the reason behind my choice of words, I think it would be best to first cite a reference. Below is an excerpt taken from the official transcript in both Chinese and English of a session of the Legislative Council meeting of the Hong Kong Government.
If one is to translate the phrase word by word and word for word, as literally as possible, then "正確看待" would best be translated as "to treat properly" or "to look upon correctly". But then the meaning of the sentence becomes ambiguous and I am afraid that is not what Ma Long has wanted to put across, which is reflected in your interpretation. Different standards for different people. As all of us have witnessed the past few days, people s opinions are split, but what makes right from wrong? Just as one person has neatly summarized it: Edited by zeio - 10/28/2014 at 11:41pm |
|||||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||||
Ringer84
Silver Member Joined: 04/12/2014 Location: West Virginia Status: Offline Points: 584 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Did anyone see Timo s impossible backhand flip against Zhang Jike, the backhand flip master himself? It was an absolutely unreturnable shot at an incredible angle that left Jike completely frozen. It was my favorite shot of all the highlights I ve seen of this tournament:
http://www.infinitelooper.com/?v=54Jv3GeP8j8&p=n#/238;249 Put it in infinitelooper for your enjoyment. Edited by Ringer84 - 10/29/2014 at 12:09am |
|||||
stiltt
Assistant Admin Joined: 07/15/2007 Location: Location Status: Offline Points: 1026 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
infinitelooper.com? what a great site for tt people; thanks for that too!
why does timo raise a finger? just by habit? or does he say "OH I did not mean to strike such a sick & nasty shot...sawy". it s sicker than sick!!! I mean zjk s return is close to perfect, barely above the net; timo s timing is just ideal; blade, rubber, man, incoming speed and spin...all was coming together for the awesome 3rd ball kill flick.
|
|||||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Rosskopf has now turned to the media to openly voice his opinion on the matter. But the Germans do not seem to think that way, on the night of the 28th, chief editor of Table Tennis World Eve said within her clique: "German team coach Zhu Xiaoyong has just shot me a photo through Weixin, which is about German team head coach Rosskopf voicing his support for ZJK in the local newspaper, saying that the fine is too heavy. Zhu says that, the Germans, players included, also feel that ZJK was just too exhilarated after winning, that his action was slightly overboard, but not the same as throwing a fit from losing, and also it didn t affect the match. A fine of over 30,000 euros for such a small mistake is too ruthless." 对于此事,国际乒坛名将奥恰洛夫也在自己的微博中说到:“虽然他有失控了几秒中,但请大家不过太过负面的评价他,因为他没有给任何人带来伤害!” Regarding the matter, Ovtcharov has also expressed in his Weibo that "even though he went out-of-control for a few seconds, everyone please do not rate him too negatively, as he did not cause harm to anyone!"
Edited by zeio - 10/29/2014 at 12:32am |
|||||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I think it clipped the net, albeit by the tiniest amount. Boll is such a gentlemen.
|
|||||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||||
stiltt
Assistant Admin Joined: 07/15/2007 Location: Location Status: Offline Points: 1026 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
|
|||||
Baal
Forum Moderator Joined: 01/21/2010 Location: unknown Status: Offline Points: 14336 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Since I don t read Chinese I can t comment authoritatively so I am writing as a native English speaker. I can t see how "in a more positive manner" works in English because I can t imagine Ma Long wants people to think that the kicking barrier incident was a good thing that needs to be seen in a positive manner, which is how I would interpret Zeio s phrase. He clearly does not want people to look at it negatively, either (according to what he is saying) Instead he wants people to see it accurately, he wants people to look upon it correctly. Meaning, he understands that ZJK had a great deal of pent-up emotion and did not mean the actions as an insult to him (Ma Long) or anybody in particular. So maybe the literal translation is good in this case? It is not in the least bit ambiguous to me grammatically. A more colloquial way to put it would be that he just wants people "to see it for what it was". Just asking. |
|||||
roundrobin
Premier Member Joined: 10/02/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4708 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
he just wants people "to see it for what it was" (as a spontaneous release of pent-up emotion, not malicious) This is the correct interpretation. |
|||||
Current USATT Rating: 2181
Argentina National Team Member, 1985-1986. Current Club: Los Angeles Table Tennis Association. My Setup: Yinhe Q1 / T64 2.1 black / Saviga V 0.5mm red |
|||||
kindof99
Premier Member Joined: 02/07/2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Only the third place is happy. |
|||||
*_strataras_*
Gold Member Joined: 04/19/2010 Location: Greece Status: Offline Points: 1156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
How can t be???The number one and number too, know very well that when they return to China, the Chinese goverment will take the 50% from the price!Despite the fact that the number one will take nothing :(
|
|||||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Baal, I m sorry but that doesn t work. "To see it for what it is, to take it for what it is, or to recognize it for what it is" means the true essence of something, or "看某物的本質" in Chinese, whose expression is entirely different and would deviate too much from the intended meaning of "正確看待". Using the organ donation after death reference again, the word 正確 in the phrase "正確對待死亡" means right, correctly, or properly, which carries a positive connotation. If we were to change it to "看死亡的本質" or "to see the true essence of death", which to me means to view death from a philosophical standpoint. I doubt that is the intention of the council member, which is for the government to educate the general public in changing their perceptions of death, to recognize the potential benefits for the communities and not only see just the bad side of it, hence the choice of "in a positive manner". I feel that is the same case for Ma Long. Now back to your interpretation "he wants people to see it accurately". The word accurately is expressed differently as "準確地" in Chinese, which is considered a related word with "正確地", but not synonymous. The passage below is taken from an article on the Radio Television Hong Kong site. ……新聞報導的「正確性」與「準確性」既有內在聯繫又有明顯區別。「真實性」、「準確性」講的是新聞報導的屬性,重在事實,體現在新聞採集、製作的過程中,而「正確性」主要指新聞報導發出後產生的社會作用和影響,即報導效果。正確的報導必須是真實的、準確的,但是真實的、準確的報導從社會效果的某些角度看未必都是正確的。 ...The "correctness" and "accurateness" of news reporting are both related yet different. "Truthfulness" and "accurateness" mean the attribute of the news report, focusing on fact, which is reflected in the news gathering and the production process, whereas "correctness" mostly means the social roles and effects after the issuance of the news report, which is the effect of reporting. Correct reporting must be true and accurate, but true and accurate reporting is not necessarily correct when viewed from certain angles of its social impact. Edited by zeio - 10/29/2014 at 6:19am |
|||||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||||
assiduous
Platinum Member Joined: 05/01/2011 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2521 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I think ITTF flucked up twice here.
First they accept ZJK s own offer to return 45000 USD for this NOTHING. Second, they decide it would look STRONG if they present it to the public as THEY IMPOSED the fine, with their strong hand . But now this whole thing backfired in ITTF s ass. Virtually everyone is expressing understanding to ZJK s action, and everyone is condemning the heavy fine. Do not underestimate the weight of social media. I actually think that if the same thing happens again, they will NOT DARE place such outlandish fine again. That was an ugly decision and I believe they now regret it. They know the even would have looked much better on TV if ITTF had fined him 2000 USD.
|
|||||
puppy412 : Sorry man, I don't mean to sound disrespectful, but I know that more training will make me better, I don't need to come here to figure that out
|
|||||
mhnh007
Platinum Member Joined: 11/17/2009 Status: Offline Points: 2800 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Zeio translation is fine. I think we all know what ML meant to basically keep an open mind, which most of us do anyway. When we saw what happened, most of us probabbly went Jez... that s crazy! , and that s that. The message is actually for a few who felt sad, or devastated, and fear that some children will not grow up to be the same, and truly hope that ZKJ will be better and thing like this will never ever happens again , some even trying to see a different angle like it can be a hidden agenda or somethig bigger than what it is.
|
|||||
slevin
Premier Member Joined: 03/15/2012 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 3602 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Can there be only 1 single nominated coach per player for the whole tournament?
I ain t got no skin in the game but I wonder how ML s results would have been different if the CNT allowed the 2 finalists to have a coach each. That should normalize their results (as, if there was a non-Chinese in the finals, the Chinese finalist would have had one). If having coaches was allowed in the finals, the CNT should have nominated them for the players. I agree with fatt: while winning 7th game 12-10 does have big financial / esteem impact, from a purely TT perspective, they were basically equal adversaries (though we have to remind ourselves that ZJK was injured).
|
|||||
Trade feedback:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=50787 |
|||||
RPB23
Super Member Joined: 02/23/2014 Location: U.S.A. Status: Offline Points: 239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
In English, looking at something in a positive manana, means looking something on its up side, or, the half-cup full analogy if you may. Here, no way Ma Long was endorsing Zhang s post match behavior by asking us to look something good out of kicking the barriers. Rather, he was asking us to be understandable to Zhang s outburst(because he was under great pressure, bla,bla...)
|
|||||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
There is something bigger now going on in China. A conversation with LGL in a recent TV program has gone viral. It is about how LGL "coerced" Wang Hao into treating the Olympic singles final as lost, which was meant as a way to take some of the weight off of him and also to serve as a buffer so that he wouldn t break down during the teams event in case he lost. LGL and WH had both spoken multiple times to the media about this right after the Olympics. Now the media has gotten the wrong idea and interpret that as a team order to fix the match.
|
|||||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||||
RPB23
Super Member Joined: 02/23/2014 Location: U.S.A. Status: Offline Points: 239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Good points. The irony is had the fine been just $2000, which would be pretty reasonable, it wouldn t have generated such media disturbance or exposure. A post match celebration going a little far resulted a fine of the whole price money is unheard of, hence it generated media attention. Usually, a penalty of voiding the prize money only happen when the winning player was caught cheating, or violated drug or equipment rules. Of course, the title will also be discredited. In ZJK s case, none of these happened and he still holds the title. Keeping the title but voiding the whole prize money? What a bizarre decision!
|
|||||
RPB23
Super Member Joined: 02/23/2014 Location: U.S.A. Status: Offline Points: 239 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
I would say, ML and ZJK still have better chance go to the next Olympic singles. XX is very likely also goes though he may not be playing the singles. Fan has the least chance. However, the big factor is who wins the upcoming World s single. If XX wins the single, he has the up hand for one of two single slots. Then, it would be interesting to see who will be left between ML and ZJK. I guess, whoever appears in the final will be closer to the single ticket. Well, with Chinese, sometimes it is not just performance. inner-circle connections, politics also get to play. I am rooting for the messy situation in which XX and FZD meet at the World s single final.
|
|||||
mg
Silver Member Joined: 05/18/2011 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 984 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Funny, nobody mentions that ZJK had to play a bit dirty this time in order do win it. I mean cleaning his side of the table with the towel during the sets was quite intentional and there was quite a bit of stretching and walking around at certain points of the game. I mean OK, pressure, maybe an injury (ML also had his waist wrapped around so you never know) but it was intentional. I m not saying he didn t deserve to win but ML had been slammed for less theatrics between the points. I agree that ML lost the last set because he became predictable when serving at the end, same goes for Boll who had a real chance to win. IMO ZJK had always won against ML with some mind games, that s OK -if somebody has a weakness you just exploit it. But ML has really improved mentally recently and ZJK knew it and didn t hesitate to go further in order to break his rhythm. Anyway. About the pressure - it is just the same for ML or XX (actually even worse -they haven t won anything in singles yet). So this can t be an excuse. If somebody likes his action on Sunday, that it his personal opinion. I don t. It was just totally out of place and stupid. And it didn t seem then he has any kind of injury. That being said I still think that these two are just the best players in the world right now and every encounter between them is a real pleasure for the fans.
|
|||||
My feedback:
http://www.mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=47297&title=mg-feedback |
|||||
ocvillager
Gold Member Joined: 07/06/2008 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1531 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Agree
|
|||||
zeio
Premier Member Joined: 03/25/2010 Status: Offline Points: 10833 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Oh, please, check out this interview with Ma Long. It roughly goes, ML: Nah, I don t feel that. It was a release after his victory. Reporter: He had it reined in pretty hard, didn t he? ML: Ah...right. He is an athlete. Ever since his loss in Tokyo, his mind has been under some pressure, more or less. Then, after this win, he was able to release a bit! While the endorsement aspect of his statement is open to interpretation, to me Ma Long does view it in a positive manner. I m not certain how anyone can understand the violent behavior of another without a positive attitude. Again, it is not uncommon for "正確" to be translated as "positive". Edited by zeio - 10/29/2014 at 6:05pm |
|||||
Viscaria FL - 91g
+ Neo H3 2.15 Blk - 44.5g(55.3g uncut bare) + Hexer HD 2.1 Red - 49.3g(68.5g 〃 〃) = 184.8g |
|||||
zjkfanforever
Super Member Joined: 10/20/2013 Location: united states Status: Offline Points: 98 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Can you please stop being a sour loser and take the loss gracefully like Ma Long did? What do you mean Zhang Jike had to play dirty to win? Each player wants to control the game so that it would play out the way he likes it. Some like it fast paced and others prefer slow paced, depending on their playing style. There s nothing wrong with what Zhang Jike did on court; otherwise, he would have received a warning from umpire. Both guys played well and either could have won, it was that close. Please do not put down what Zhang Jike had achieved, that s unfair to him for what he had gone through. He injured his back during practice back in China and had an injection to stop the pain before coming to the World Cup. He still felt numb in his back after arriving in Germany, and Liu Guoliang had to call doctor in China to seek advise on his conditions. The doctor said that if he s still not improving then maybe he should not play at all. But he persevered. Also considering that he had to play two 7 set games (a total of 14 sets) against two of the best players in the world on the same day within a few hours. So, please show some respect to the guy who had given all he has to win. Furthermore, it s true that Ma Long had dominated over Zhang Jike in the past, but in 2014 the head-to-head record between the two were even prior to the World Cup final. The two met four times this year, and the win-loss ratio were 2-2, including: Grand Final: Ma Long 4-3 Zhang Jike Tokyo Trial: Zhang Jike 3-1 Ma Long Tokyo Warm Up: Ma Long 3-1 Zhang Jike CTTSL: Zhang Jike 3-1 Ma Long So, now on any given day, either could win over the other. If Ma Long still thinks he could walk over Zhang Jike like his fans do and does not take him seriously as a dangerous opponent, then I won t be surprised if he looses again. Why did Zhang Jike react so "violently" after the win? Because he had tremendous respect for Ma Long as an opponent, and he knew that it s not an easy win and luck was on his side that day. Although Zhang Jike has four major titles under his belt before the World Cup, people still have no respect for his achievements just because he did not win any of his titles on route to beat Ma Long, the best player in the world in a lot of TT fans eyes. He has to prove he is worthy of his achievements by beating Ma Long, his nemesis, in a major tournament and he did. |
|||||
kindof99
Premier Member Joined: 02/07/2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
The Ma long fans always say that ZJK can only beat chinese to win the champion. That is also very unfair. It is almost always chinese vs chinese in the final. So to get the champion, you got to beat a chinese opponent at the end. But before that, it is a long trip to the journey to the final. Like this world cup, it is not that easy for ZJK to beat the black horse Arun and Timo.
When FZD leans more about the tricks of ML, he will start to beat him too.
|
|||||
vutiendat1337
Gold Member Joined: 10/25/2010 Location: Minneapolis, MN Status: Offline Points: 1324 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
LOL, fanboyism at its best. Unlike ZJK, Ma Long is well-known for delaying tactics, wiping hands on the table, raising a hand right before opponents begins to serve. Ma Long did this on numerous occasions in the past during more or less important points. Once, Petr Korbel snapped and went on a brief rant because of that and got a yellow card. For what is worth, I spend a LOT of time watching TT matches both highlights on youtube and full versions (which I download to my pc) and I have seen Ma Lond doing it consistently more than ZJK against any given player. In fact, players like Timo or Dima, or any other player for that matter, have these moments once in a while due to pressure of the moment. But from I can see, with Ma Long it s more of a pattern whenever he wants to break the momentum. I agree with you, I didn t really notice ZJK being injured or playing visibly sub-par or anything but it s been released in press prior and after the tournament that ZJK had issues with his back and even needed an injection. Knowing that and given the opponents he had to face to win the this sorry-ass excuse of a major title, hats off to ZJK. In terms of tactics, in this match, ZJK was smarter and read ML s moves better then the other way around. For example, in the previous match against, Ma Long would do this unexpected "flat push" to BH side against ZJK s reverse pendulum which caught him off-guard more than once. This time, ZJK was prepared every single time. Plus, ZJK was saving that sick banana flick receive against the short ML s serve for the last 2 sets(if my memory serves) in order to use it when it counted the most. Yes, 7th game, deuce, it just doesn t get closer than that but ZJK won because he made the right choices and the right moves at the right time. Having said that, I am glad ZJK started to get a better read on ML compared to 2013 when ML would win in the 7th having exploited ZJK s weaknesses.
|
|||||
NextLevel
Forum Moderator Joined: 12/15/2011 Location: Somewhere Good Status: Offline Points: 14845 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
+1. It s fairly ridiculous to watch such a great match and complain about things like cleaning the table in between games. That ZJK could repeat the pattern of the last two points of game 3 in game 7 in a very similar situation just reveals that he outmaneuvered ML at the right time.
|
|||||
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon FH/BH: H3P 41D. Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train... |
|||||
kindof99
Premier Member Joined: 02/07/2014 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||
Watch 2013 Kuwait open. zjk is much faster and activer.He beat ml 3:1 in the final.
|
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 16171819> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |