|
|
|
fastest rubber: FastarcG1, Tenergy05, Thibar MXP |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
merlin el mago 
Super Member 
Joined: 04/14/2018 Location: Blanes - Girona Status: Offline Points: 118 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: fastest rubber: FastarcG1, Tenergy05, Thibar MXPPosted: 12/25/2020 at 12:17pm |
|
What's the fastest rubber: Fastarc G1 VS Tenergy 05 VS Thibar MXP?
Edited by merlin el mago - 12/25/2020 at 12:20pm |
|
|
No more political prisoners in Catalonia.
|
|
 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
Skynet
Super Member
Joined: 10/22/2019 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12/25/2020 at 12:36pm |
|
MX-P
|
|
|
|
|
jfolsen
Gold Member 
Joined: 03/15/2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1296 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12/25/2020 at 12:40pm |
|
Not Fastarc G1. I play with it on my backhand, good spin, good control, very linear (as in you get out of it what you put into it). I really like it, but any Tenergy is faster.
|
|
|
|
|
Shiro
Member 
Joined: 03/15/2017 Location: San Diego, CA Status: Offline Points: 90 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12/26/2020 at 1:56pm |
|
The MX-P 50 is extremely fast if you want to give that a try.
|
|
|
|
|
merlin el mago
Super Member
Joined: 04/14/2018 Location: Blanes - Girona Status: Offline Points: 118 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12/29/2020 at 6:25am |
|
I'm weighing to use T05 1.8 mm to keep the spin and increase the speed. What do you think?
|
|
|
No more political prisoners in Catalonia.
|
|
|
|
|
Skynet
Super Member
Joined: 10/22/2019 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 156 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12/29/2020 at 6:56am |
If you go down in sponge thickness, you would actually lose (potential) spin and speed, because less sponge equals less catapult and less material you (would) need to "grab" the ball and give it spin. That's probably not the solution to whatever your problem is, if I take your thoughts on this matter into consideration. I have played T05 with both 2.1 and 1.9 mm and there is a very noticible difference in terms of spin and speed capabilities. In the days of the plastic ball I do not see any reason to go down even further in sponge thickness.
|
|
|
|
|
merlin el mago
Super Member
Joined: 04/14/2018 Location: Blanes - Girona Status: Offline Points: 118 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12/29/2020 at 9:45am |
|
Thanks for advice.
|
|
|
No more political prisoners in Catalonia.
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |
Topic Options
merlin el mago wrote: