WHO d'you mostly AGREE with in MYTT? & NOT?

I see there are some members with whom i fairly consistantly agree with on opinions reviews etc. ... and with some who are on the other pole...almost predictably!!

Edited by debraj - 08/22/2010 at 2:17am

Potentially dangerous area to enter.  

bozbrisvegas wrote: Potentially dangerous area to enter.

I completely disagree

Fine I'll jump straight in. Anton, Beeray1, Rack

Best99 wrote: I think it mostly depends on the personality of each of us. There are some people who naturally tend to discuss, whereas other persons who agree on everything. As a matter of fact, I always try to give my most honest opinion, since I think that a forum is made up not in order to agree or disagree constantly with other people, but to share different points of view.

These are the Best words on the topic I'd say. But I have something to add.

  The question is very interesting for me, maybe not directly, but in its implications. We are all somehow different, so when people advise each other on equipment it's just natural that doesn't go for everyone. So the subquestion is: what is the level of difference between people which makes any discussions impossible and fruitless? If two people totally disagree on something, I think (IMHO) they would never come close. They might brawl but not crawl towards the agreement. On the other hand, if people totally agree, there's nothing to discuss and ask about. So what is the acceptable level of disagreement, when it's still possible to convince each other? My guess is around 20% (I'm obsessed with 80-20 stuff )
 Anyway, I believe this figure exists. Say it is equal to N%. In this case somebody able to give advice in principal would give you good advice if and only if your style doesn't differ from his more than N%.
 Another painful thing. It is painful for Russian TT forums - there're 3 big forums at the moment. Well, it's painful for me. To cut a long story short, we as a community can't suppress unconstructive disagreement, destructive disagreement. To be more precise, when the sh*t hits the fan, we just wipe on towels pretending it's another six points. So IMHO everybody should feel responsibility for any disagreement he brings in.


Edited by dimikkio - 08/20/2010 at 1:36am

When it comes to the game, tactics and stuff, I rarely disagree with APW and I think we see TT the same way. Then there are others, Like Anton, JimT, PPRob and Boz who I mostly agree with but not always. As for people I don't agree with, there are a couple of those as well, but I think it's better not to name them here.

There is a small band of 'cross forum' posters who I get on extremely well with, Speedplay being one of them, I also think the mods are pretty good on here, being one myself elsewhere, I know how hard it can be to get the balance right between moderation and sensorship.

gee thanks mate:p I agree with both Boz and Rob also, they just don't agree with each other : ). Beeray1 is the guy I most agree with about rubbers, I haven't seen him suggest one I didn't like yet and looking forward to him writing more about this new one he's trying now. That's nothing to do with what's a great rubber and what isn't but clearly I play well with the same rubbers he does.

popperlocker wrote: this is an interesting thread, it's like online matchmaking. Find your perfect match! If you agree with a person a lot, you may have very similar styles with one another or mentality. my match made in heaven is Boz, but I've been sending flirtatious looks to Nicefrog and hitting on Icontek. I'm a playa what can i say

Best post so far, but not sure that I agree .

I agree the most with APW46. Also, I agree often with other Europeans. However, without the knowledge of the game and style of the users, it is hard to judge their posts.
Also, Peter79 has my respect, but I cant understand, how he can play with hexer. I also never agreed with debraj and his hexer obsession (it is fair to say that I dont like hexer). But it is not about personality, usually there is one, two or several things to disagree with, which is OK.

My vote goes for Debraj for agreement.
চালিয়ে যান দেবরাজদা, আছি আপনার সাথে। পোস্টটা হয়েছেও সেরকম।

I mostly agree with austin, anton, sid and yogi. 

hungga wrote: I even found good things with sidofmillenium especially his struggle to prove the odd.

 So have I, he's not a total idiot, he actually says some really good stuff at times. Its abit like Hayleys comet though (every 75 yrs)

Edited by APW46 - 08/20/2010 at 5:18pm

fatt wrote: I mostly agree with austin, anton, sid and yogi.