Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Yinhe Big Dipper - Review
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Yinhe Big Dipper - Review

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 21>
Author
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/08/2015 at 12:43am
Where do you live? I have 40 and 38, and am about to order 39
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
tom View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 11/18/2013
Location: canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3016
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/08/2015 at 7:53am
Originally posted by cole_ely cole_ely wrote:

Where do you live? I have 40 and 38, and am about to order 39
Montreal
Back to Top
spinnyserve View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 11/01/2014
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 148
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote spinnyserve Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/14/2015 at 12:52pm
Does someone know how Big Dipper compares to DHS TinArc 5 or GoldArc 3?  
Back to Top
TurboZ View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 05/31/2012
Status: Offline
Points: 1298
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TurboZ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/14/2015 at 6:20pm
Just got some BD in 40 and they are again no corner cut and dome. It seems there is no pattern of what you will get. Last order of 39 was 8 corners and flat.

BD is a Chinese style tacky rubber with heavy tune feel while TA5 is half tacky hybrid type. Both with hard sponge and TA5 is more bouncy. I have not weight them but TA5 seems much heavier in comparison.
Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 9:07am
Dipper is pretty heavy....tickling 70.  So I sure hope your other rubber isn't heavier!

Everybody keeps calling dipper tacky.  Maybe a little waxy, but not sticky.  I suppose if you're used to something like sriver it may seem a little tacky.  I have a friend who bought some juic rubber after attending the stellan bengston camp.  I don't know how you're supposed to spin the ball at all with that stuff. For topspin, you have to sink the ball like crazy.  I have no idea how to get a spinny serve with that stuff.

But compared to, say moon pro or hurricane, big dipper isn't really tacky at all.  
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 9:54am
Cole, good points. The tackiness of Big Dipper is a small and minor part of the story. Even though I have used it for 3 mths, I get the impression that it has probably played better as the topsheet has worn off if at all.   Still tacky though. My situation reminds me of those players who love their really old sheets of unboosted Hurricane 3

BTW, you are probably talking about Juic Nanospin II. That rubber plays better and gets grippier as it gets older. It doesn't get great enough IMO for me to wait that long, but when broken in, it is great.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 10:03am
it was nanospin.  sponge was hard and top was slick.  Youd have to loop like a bear to sink that ball enough to get spin.
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 10:11am
Originally posted by cole_ely cole_ely wrote:

it was nanospin.  sponge was hard and top was slick.  Youd have to loop like a bear to sink that ball enough to get spin.
Some rubbers play better as the topsheet gets worn and the pips get revealed.  I don't know why but they do.  Nanospin 2 is slick when you start using it, but if you are a high level looper, you can wear the topsheet enough to get good grip in about 10 hours.  Lower level loopers will take more time and for some people, it may never really change.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
hookumsnivy View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/04/2010
Location: Syracuse, NY
Status: Offline
Points: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hookumsnivy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 11:19am
Originally posted by cole_ely cole_ely wrote:

Dipper is pretty heavy....tickling 70.  So I sure hope your other rubber isn't heavier!

Agreed.  I've weighed 2 39s and a 40 all with the corners cut off.
39:  both were 67.2g - hooray for consistency.
40:  70.4g!

That's really heavy especially when you consider they were missing their corners.

Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 11:28am
It gets lighter as the booster wears off. Maybe its my 38 deg spong buy it doesn't feel that heavy.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
hookumsnivy View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/04/2010
Location: Syracuse, NY
Status: Offline
Points: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hookumsnivy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 11:33am
Based on the weights of the 39 and 40, I would expect the 38 to be a few grams lighter to begin with.
Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 11:49am
Actually, if the rubber is saturated with tuner, I don't think the density should matter in terms of weight out of the package.  
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
TurboZ View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 05/31/2012
Status: Offline
Points: 1298
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TurboZ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 12:23pm
I see Yinhe's description of BD is "takes Chinese tacky rubber to new height". It can't compare to traditional Chinese rubber in tackiness but still belong to the category. I just check and it is on par with my year old H3.

I have BD and T64 on Intensity Cpen that weights only 169g, while TA5 and TG3 on HL5 FL weights a whopping 205g. That's why I get the impression of BD being much lighter than TA5. In fact most of my Cpen setups are well over 180g so I don't find BD heavy. Of course the BD cut to Cpen FH is much smaller than TA5 on Shakehand BH so the weight difference is expected. Will have to weight them separately and see.

Edited by TurboZ - 01/15/2015 at 12:29pm
Back to Top
hookumsnivy View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/04/2010
Location: Syracuse, NY
Status: Offline
Points: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hookumsnivy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 12:28pm
Originally posted by TurboZ TurboZ wrote:


I have BD and T64 on Intensity Cpen that weights only 169g, while TA5 and TG3 on HL5 FL weights a whopping 205g. That's why I get the impression of BD being much lighter than TA5. In fact most of my Cpen setups are well over 180g so I don't find BD heavy. Will have to weight it separately and see.

What's the weight of your blade by itself?  How much of a gap do you have on each side?  I'd like to get under 170 if I could.
Back to Top
TurboZ View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 05/31/2012
Status: Offline
Points: 1298
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TurboZ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/15/2015 at 12:56pm
Originally posted by hookumsnivy hookumsnivy wrote:


What's the weight of your blade by itself?  How much of a gap do you have on each side?  I'd like to get under 170 if I could.


The HL5 is 95g. I have not weight the bare Intensity alone as it already came with rubbers attached when new. Back then it has Calibra Tour M FH and Yasaka Mark V XS BH that weights 162g. I have one other Cpen setup that is below 160g. A Stiga Offensive Wood NCT with H3 FH and Stiga Innova Ultra Light BH which weights a mere 159g.

Gap is about 1cm or less FH and full cut BH. BD is 39 degree and T64 1.9.

Edited by TurboZ - 01/15/2015 at 1:00pm
Back to Top
berkeleydoctor View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 01/06/2010
Location: California
Status: Offline
Points: 699
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote berkeleydoctor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/19/2015 at 11:20am
so i finally tried this today, as our club owner had it on his racket. I have to agree with Vic, it was not a very good rubber. Slow, dead, and only had some kick on very active strokes. The spin is good, almost like tenergy spin, but only on active strokes. Blocking like others have mentioned is a terrifying experience with BD. 

I do enjoy the blue sponge thoWink i tested with black 38degree 2.2 on an all wood blade
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/19/2015 at 3:36pm
It's the fastest Chinese rubber I know. For me, that is,more than good enough. It's not for everyone, but I think MX-P and Spinart lovers should look at it even if they end up hating it. You have to play ten feet off the table to sat you can't block well with it.

It's a rubber that has to be used for a period to appreciate its strengths. You can loop drive and flat hit spinny loops and the blocking requires some changes if you come from Euro. But now, I prefer the range I have with BD.

Edited by NextLevel - 01/19/2015 at 3:44pm
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
cole_ely View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/16/2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cole_ely Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/19/2015 at 7:30pm
I had a guy today tell me he thought it was slow. Doesn't feel slow to me.  Maybe it is the tackiness of the top.  Maybe they're not used to having to sink the ball into the sponge, coming from non-Chinese stuff.

Or maybe it is slow compared to tenergy. Wouldn't shock me.  This guy was a tenergy user.
Wavestone St with Illumina 1.9r, defender1.7b

Please let me know if I can be of assistance.
Back to Top
hookumsnivy View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/04/2010
Location: Syracuse, NY
Status: Offline
Points: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hookumsnivy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/19/2015 at 8:32pm
This rubber is definitely not slow.  It's not the fastest out there, or even close to it, but it's not slow.
The only thing I don't like about it is the weight.  I'd like it to be a bit lighter.

I absolutely love the price/performance ratio.
I left h3neo prov behind and couldn't be happier.  Obviously there were some trade offs, but I think it was worth it.
Back to Top
1dennistt View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/03/2010
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 533
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 1dennistt Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/19/2015 at 8:52pm
I tried it on a blade with Hinoki outer plys, and it was medium at best when hitting.  Much better when looping, I was amazed at the spin and dip.  I'm don't think it worked well on this blade at all.  Will need to try it on something else, and also give it some time to break in a little more.  I currently have it mounted on a Giant Dragon ALC Engery blade, but haven't had an opportunity to try it on this blade yet.  

I'm hoping for better results, I have it mounted opposite my newest sheet of Moon Pro for comparison. This is the blade I used the Moon Pro on for a number of years, so I'm pretty familiar with it's characteristics. I believe it should make the BD play more lively. 
Donic Waldner World Champion 1989 ZLC (Inner), Donic BlueStorm Pro (Red) Max, ????? (Black) 1.8 mm)
Back to Top
hookumsnivy View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/04/2010
Location: Syracuse, NY
Status: Offline
Points: 1599
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hookumsnivy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/19/2015 at 9:19pm
I got lucky.  I tried it on my backup blade 1st since I didn't want to take off the H3Neo on my primary blade 1st.  My backup was a Xiom Stradivarius (koto top ply) and I really enjoyed it.  After that, I tried it on my primary blade - Xiom Zetro Quad (hinoki top ply), but I didn't like it nearly as much.
Obviously this is a very small sample size, but I suspect it doesn't match up well with soft outer layers like hinoki.
I'm curious what others think about blade pairings.

Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/19/2015 at 11:50pm
Originally posted by cole_ely cole_ely wrote:

I had a guy today tell me he thought it was slow. Doesn't feel slow to me.  Maybe it is the tackiness of the top.  Maybe they're not used to having to sink the ball into the sponge, coming from non-Chinese stuff.

Or maybe it is slow compared to tenergy. Wouldn't shock me.  This guy was a tenergy user.

It's slow compared to Tenergy or tensors when hitting, but just as good as anything out there when looping.  Definitely faster than most traditional hard sponged tacky rubbers.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
Vardant View Drop Down
Member
Member
Avatar

Joined: 04/14/2013
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 61
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Vardant Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 6:57am
Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:

It's the fastest Chinese rubber I know. For me, that is,more than good enough. It's not for everyone, but I think MX-P and Spinart lovers should look at it even if they end up hating it. You have to play ten feet off the table to sat you can't block well with it.

It's a rubber that has to be used for a period to appreciate its strengths. You can loop drive and flat hit spinny loops and the blocking requires some changes if you come from Euro. But now, I prefer the range I have with BD.
I've been using MX-P until now and you're right. It feels really similar. Loops dip faster and are a little bit easier. I've expected a little bit more spin though, when I've heard people comparing this to H3.

I wonder how the Hurricane topsheet combined with the BD sponge would play.

Btw. I'm talking about the 39 deg version


Edited by Vardant - 01/21/2015 at 6:59am
Back to Top
AndySmith View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/12/2008
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 4378
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AndySmith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 8:47am
Having used a lot of Chinese rubbers over the years, BD represents a big jump up in terms of quality and usability IMO. There are quite a few cheap Chinese rubbers knocking around this year which are really serious alternatives to a lot of eurojap rubbers, but BD is still a little unique amongst that crowd by being a semi-tacky hybrid. It just doesn't compare directly to most other rubbers on the market (with the exception of Spinart to some degree).

BD is a big winner for me because it supports a big range of shot selection, and does everything well. It doesn't have the easy power of a tensor, and it doesn't match the spin potential of a brush loop with H3, but it's solid everywhere and gives good results when brushing, driving, or anything really. But you have to WANT the hybrid nature of BD to feel the benefit. It will feel slower (especially in the low gears) compared to (e.g.) Bluefire M1 - it's semi-tacky. It won't beat H3's brushing ability - the sponge isn't as stable and the tack isn't as high. But in my real world play, I get good results by mixing my shot selection up with BD. I can switch between a heavy spin brush stroke (landing short, awkward) and a flatter drive with more ease than I can with any other rubber. I can block far better I can than H3, and I find recovery shots while on the stretch are easier too. I can mix the play up without much worry of the ball shooting long. It's not overly bouncy, so the short game is a breeze. But it's not a specialist rubber in any category, so if you aren't looking for a hybrid then you'll most likely feel disappointed in some way.

I also don't think it pairs up well with soft blades (at least, not the 38 deg one), so it doesn't particularly surprise me if people don't like it on hinoki outers. It has a off/on characteristic which supresses the low-speed bounce while retaining elastic response, so paired with a blade with a similar profile can result in too much non-linear behaviour. It's borderline for me on the ayous outer of my Pure Wood, and I prefer it on the Peterpan or Hypertouch overall.

But come on. It's £12 a sheet - 1/4 of the price of tenergy. Expectations should be realistic.
This was a great signature until I realised it was overrated.
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 9:57am
I use it on my Samsonov Force Pro with limba and ayous (I believe) and have no complaints.  I've toyed with the idea of getting a Stratus Powerwood to go with it...

If anyone who comes from or uses Tenergy or most modern tensor rubbers complains about non-linearity in any rubber, shame on them.  From H3, I understand that complaint, but with BD, that is what you are signing up for with the MaxTense sponge.

I always liked tacky rubbers, but the problem with hard sponges with low catapult was always and issue and I didn't boost.  Maybe I got stronger and better, but I can use BD more easily when I am late to the ball and it doesn't take as much work to get decent pace.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
tom View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 11/18/2013
Location: canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3016
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 11:22am
I didn't go thru all the posts in this mega thread, but would it be fair to say while BD is closer to Euro/Jap tensor than H3 but if I don't like H3 and have have a strong preference for rubber like Rasant Grip or Turbo over H3, then with the price difference disregarded, I would be happier with them than a BD?
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 11:34am
Originally posted by tom tom wrote:

I didn't go thru all the posts in this mega thread, but would it be fair to say while BD is closer to Euro/Jap tensor than H3 but if I don't like H3 and have have a strong preference for rubber like Rasant Grip or Turbo over H3, then with the price difference disregarded, I would be happier with them than a BD?

Without playing with it for a period of time, no (and for me, it was used for a month on a spare blade before I realized I just played better with it given my style) and the reason you strongly prefer Grip is the key.  

I am a player exactly like you described and am happier with BD than with Grip.  The first impression you get from BD is the slower hitting speed, but when you see the looping control and touch shots, then make some adjustments for other shots, you can then decide what you really feel.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
tom View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 11/18/2013
Location: canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3016
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 12:23pm
Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:

Originally posted by tom tom wrote:

I didn't go thru all the posts in this mega thread, but would it be fair to say while BD is closer to Euro/Jap tensor than H3 but if I don't like H3 and have have a strong preference for rubber like Rasant Grip or Turbo over H3, then with the price difference disregarded, I would be happier with them than a BD?

Without playing with it for a period of time, no (and for me, it was used for a month on a spare blade before I realized I just played better with it given my style) and the reason you strongly prefer Grip is the key.  

I am a player exactly like you described and am happier with BD than with Grip.  The first impression you get from BD is the slower hitting speed, but when you see the looping control and touch shots, then make some adjustments for other shots, you can then decide what you really feel.

thanks NL, a month or so to get use to it is a big gamble.  I tried two combinations this Summer that should help me in the long run both for a month or so.  One I discovered, on a 1 ply Hinoki blade that had to be discarded forever because the blade was too thick for me to manoeuvre effectively in a game (while it was fine in practice).  The other one, I finally had to change the rubber, because the combination offered a lot of control but not enough speed.  At the end 2 months: more or less unproductive.  I was hoping someone would concur with my above thoughts and stop me  thinking about the BD, but the thought still lingers.


Edited by tom - 01/21/2015 at 12:24pm
Back to Top
NextLevel View Drop Down
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 12/15/2011
Location: Somewhere Good
Status: Offline
Points: 14845
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote NextLevel Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 12:30pm
Originally posted by tom tom wrote:

Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:

Originally posted by tom tom wrote:

I didn't go thru all the posts in this mega thread, but would it be fair to say while BD is closer to Euro/Jap tensor than H3 but if I don't like H3 and have have a strong preference for rubber like Rasant Grip or Turbo over H3, then with the price difference disregarded, I would be happier with them than a BD?

Without playing with it for a period of time, no (and for me, it was used for a month on a spare blade before I realized I just played better with it given my style) and the reason you strongly prefer Grip is the key.  

I am a player exactly like you described and am happier with BD than with Grip.  The first impression you get from BD is the slower hitting speed, but when you see the looping control and touch shots, then make some adjustments for other shots, you can then decide what you really feel.

thanks NL, a month or so to get use to it is a big gamble.  I tried two combinations this Summer that should help me in the long run both for a month or so.  One I discovered, on a 1 ply Hinoki blade that had to be discarded forever because the blade was too thick for me to manoeuvre effectively in a game (while it was fine in practice).  The other one, I finally had to change the rubber, because the combination offered a lot of control but not enough speed.  At the end 2 months more or less unproductive.  I was hoping someone would concur with my above thoughts and stop me  thinking about the BD, but the thought still lingers.

I will say this - I learned to loop with Chinese rubbers before switching to European rubbers later.  That affected my looping concept.   I have always looped well with Chinese rubbers spin wise but hate the lost speed, especially when blocking.  If that doesn't describe you, or you didn't like MX-P, then Big Dipper is not for you.
I like putting heavy topspin on the ball...
Cybershape Carbon
FH/BH: H3P 41D.
Lumberjack TT, not for lovers of beautiful strokes. No time to train...
Back to Top
tom View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 11/18/2013
Location: canada
Status: Offline
Points: 3016
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01/21/2015 at 12:50pm
Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:

Originally posted by tom tom wrote:

Originally posted by NextLevel NextLevel wrote:

Originally posted by tom tom wrote:

I didn't go thru all the posts in this mega thread, but would it be fair to say while BD is closer to Euro/Jap tensor than H3 but if I don't like H3 and have have a strong preference for rubber like Rasant Grip or Turbo over H3, then with the price difference disregarded, I would be happier with them than a BD?

Without playing with it for a period of time, no (and for me, it was used for a month on a spare blade before I realized I just played better with it given my style) and the reason you strongly prefer Grip is the key.  

I am a player exactly like you described and am happier with BD than with Grip.  The first impression you get from BD is the slower hitting speed, but when you see the looping control and touch shots, then make some adjustments for other shots, you can then decide what you really feel.

thanks NL, a month or so to get use to it is a big gamble.  I tried two combinations this Summer that should help me in the long run both for a month or so.  One I discovered, on a 1 ply Hinoki blade that had to be discarded forever because the blade was too thick for me to manoeuvre effectively in a game (while it was fine in practice).  The other one, I finally had to change the rubber, because the combination offered a lot of control but not enough speed.  At the end 2 months more or less unproductive.  I was hoping someone would concur with my above thoughts and stop me  thinking about the BD, but the thought still lingers.

I will say this - I learned to loop with Chinese rubbers before switching to European rubbers later.  That affected my looping concept.   I have always looped well with Chinese rubbers spin wise but hate the lost speed, especially when blocking.  If that doesn't describe you, or you didn't like MX-P, then Big Dipper is not for you.
I do like the MX-P and still have it on a Violin which I use once a while just for kicks.  Is the BD close to it in speed?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 89101112 21>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.313 seconds.

Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Web Wiz News
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer

MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd.

Copyright ©2003-2024 Alex Table Tennis Ltd. All rights reserved.