|
|
|
Yinhe LQ-2 vs Butterfly JSH |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
Tabmini 
Super Member 
Joined: 10/15/2013 Location: Asia Status: Offline Points: 244 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: Yinhe LQ-2 vs Butterfly JSHPosted: 05/04/2015 at 2:50am |
|
Hello! Could anyone compare these both blade? I want to know which is better for chop away from the table on both wings and still have capability for powerloop with Chinese rubber. I heard that JSH is a good blade for chop but it'll be lil bit too fast. If LQ-2 is a bit slower than JSH I think I'll go for it.
Thank you. |
|
|
My feedback :
mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=77680&PID=959859 |
|
 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
vanjr
Gold Member 
Joined: 08/19/2004 Location: Corpus Christi Status: Offline Points: 1368 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05/04/2015 at 9:14am |
|
I have played extensively with LQ-1 and LQ-2. Both are great blades. I enjoy playing with these blades so much that I have had no reason to buy a JSH which is reportedly faster. For chopping and defense LQ-2 is definitely better than LQ-1. LQ-2 has more control on BH chops and more flex so it loops better with FH. LQ-1 is harder and faster and better for close to the table play and BH blocking with LP or SP.
|
|
|
|
|
Tabmini
Super Member
Joined: 10/15/2013 Location: Asia Status: Offline Points: 244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05/04/2015 at 10:50am |
|
Thank vanjr.
Sound like you prefer LQ-2 rather than LQ-1. I'm really like a touch of cork wood on the handle which I've tried Barricade before. Could I ask you a question ? Have you played with Yinhe 980 ? How about if comparing to LQ-2. Thank you.
|
|
|
My feedback :
mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=77680&PID=959859 |
|
|
|
|
vanjr
Gold Member
Joined: 08/19/2004 Location: Corpus Christi Status: Offline Points: 1368 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05/05/2015 at 1:27pm |
|
I am currently using the LQ-1 as I stay at the table most of the time and block and hit with my thin, dead sponge SP (799) and chop less often. If I was mostly off the table i would be using LQ-2.
I have not tried yinhe 980. I do like both LQ blades better than nittaku kim kyung an and 729's W-2 and the toxic 3 and toxic 5 blade, and any other defensive blade I have ever owened. |
|
|
|
|
Tabmini
Super Member
Joined: 10/15/2013 Location: Asia Status: Offline Points: 244 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05/05/2015 at 7:25pm |
|
Thank you again vanjr.
I mostly play off the table, may be I'll go for LQ-2. |
|
|
My feedback :
mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=77680&PID=959859 |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd. |
Topic Options