Alex Table Tennis - MyTableTennis.NET Homepage
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - clipper wood vs clipper cr vs clipper cc
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login
tabletennis11.com

clipper wood vs clipper cr vs clipper cc

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
rajd1234 View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 12/01/2014
Location: U.K.
Status: Offline
Points: 271
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rajd1234 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: clipper wood vs clipper cr vs clipper cc
    Posted: 04/12/2016 at 6:51am
Hi All,

Can anyone please compare b/w these three blades?

Thanks.
...Rajd...

My feedback url: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=72846&PN=1#893078
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
JacekGM View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar

Joined: 02/17/2013
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2356
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote JacekGM Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/12/2016 at 10:08pm
Originally posted by rajd1234 rajd1234 wrote:

Hi All,

Can anyone please compare b/w these three blades?

Thanks.

May be hard to find someone who used all three...
(1) Juic SBA (Fl, 85 g) with Bluefire JP3 (red max) on FH and 0.6 mm DR N Desperado on BH; (2) Yinhe T7 (Fl, 87 g) with Bluefire M3 (red 2.0) on FH and 0.6 mm 755 on BH.
Back to Top
E.ZegnaFan View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member
Avatar

Joined: 11/15/2012
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 817
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote E.ZegnaFan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/12/2016 at 10:48pm
Take a look here:
http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=43040&title=clipper-cc-first-review-impressions
< id="hc_extension_off">< id="hc_extension_highcontrast">< id="hc_extension_highcontrast_back">< id="hc_extension_grayscale">< id="hc_extension_grayscale_back">< id="hc_extension_invert">< id="hc_extension_invert_back">< id="hc_extension_invert_grayscale">< id="hc_extension_yellow_on_black">< id="hc_extension_yellow_on_black_back">


87 Stiga Clipper/Rakza 9.
78 Stiga Super Carbon/Calibra Tour M.


LF: Old Stiga Clipper,Super Carbon in NEARLY NEW condition.
Back to Top
tabletennis11 View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member
Avatar

Joined: 06/26/2012
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 495
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tabletennis11 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/12/2016 at 11:33pm
The Clipper CC is a carbon blade but it's unique in that it has a special carbon powder between each layer, there are 6 layers of carbon powder in total. The Clipper CR is an all wood blade with extra speed and a special varnished outer veneer. The Clipper Wood or Clipper Classic is also an all wood blade and is the slower of the three.

The CC is quite heavy as it has '13' plies, 7 wood and 6 carbon powder (thin layers) usually over 90 grams. 

It's the fastest of the three. Clipper CR is a commonly used blade, we use it in all of our rubber reviews as a 'control' blade to remain consistent with testing, it has a great balance of control and reasonable pace.
Back to Top
bbkon View Drop Down
Premier Member
Premier Member


Joined: 04/19/2005
Location: Afghanistan
Status: Offline
Points: 7260
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bbkon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/13/2016 at 1:10am
Originally posted by JacekGM JacekGM wrote:

Originally posted by rajd1234 rajd1234 wrote:

Hi All,

Can anyone please compare b/w these three blades?

Thanks.


May be hard to find someone who used all three...


Cc is stiffer smaller and it will feel faster and lower throw cr a little bit more powerful and stable.clipper more control an 6 year+ old clipper is another breed better in any conceivable way. I think modern clippers use chemically softened veneers of lower quality to match better quality wood
Back to Top
seguso View Drop Down
Gold Member
Gold Member
Avatar

Joined: 03/24/2010
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 1619
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote seguso Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04/18/2016 at 3:33am
clipper wood is soft and almost stiff. easy to use but lacks power. on fh, it works best with 47.5 rubber like m1 and mx-p.

clipper cr is hard and almost stiff. they increased the hardness a lot, but not the flex. So there is a big difference in throw and speed with respect to clipper wood. lower throw, counterloops tends to go to net. on fh,  you need to use 45 deg rubber like t05 or el-p. Or m2. M1 and mx-p are too hard.

clipper cc is even harder than CR (feels like a sheet of metal, very sharp.) but also noticeably more flexible. (thinner also). So it throws higher in counterloops. a better blade than CR (unless you have pips I guess). great touch.
Here too, on fh, you need to use 45 deg rubber like t05 or el-p. Or m2. M1 and mx-p are too hard.

(Btw, clipper CC is very similar to tibhar samsonov force pro black edition)

Caveat: all the above may vary, because the thickness in clipper varies a lot: I have tried clipper CCs which are stiffer than mine, as stiff as a CR. I have also tried a CR which is much more flexible than the two I have.




Edited by seguso - 04/18/2016 at 3:41am
pg5x - mxd fh & bh - 2015 video
Back to Top
unstopabl3 View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 06/16/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 685
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote unstopabl3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/21/2017 at 5:35am
Originally posted by seguso seguso wrote:

clipper wood is soft and almost stiff. easy to use but lacks power. on fh, it works best with 47.5 rubber like m1 and mx-p.

clipper cr is hard and almost stiff. they increased the hardness a lot, but not the flex. So there is a big difference in throw and speed with respect to clipper wood. lower throw, counterloops tends to go to net. on fh,  you need to use 45 deg rubber like t05 or el-p. Or m2. M1 and mx-p are too hard.

clipper cc is even harder than CR (feels like a sheet of metal, very sharp.) but also noticeably more flexible. (thinner also). So it throws higher in counterloops. a better blade than CR (unless you have pips I guess). great touch.
Here too, on fh, you need to use 45 deg rubber like t05 or el-p. Or m2. M1 and mx-p are too hard.

(Btw, clipper CC is very similar to tibhar samsonov force pro black edition)

Caveat: all the above may vary, because the thickness in clipper varies a lot: I have tried clipper CCs which are stiffer than mine, as stiff as a CR. I have also tried a CR which is much more flexible than the two I have.




So which blade is used by most pros using a clipper, is it Stiga Clipper or Stiga Clipper CR?


Back to Top
Olio View Drop Down
Super Member
Super Member


Joined: 03/27/2012
Location: UK / France
Status: Offline
Points: 237
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Olio Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2017 at 5:23am
CR.
All of pros with clipper use Clipper CR (or CR WRB)
Back to Top
unstopabl3 View Drop Down
Silver Member
Silver Member


Joined: 06/16/2011
Status: Offline
Points: 685
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote unstopabl3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02/24/2017 at 6:15am
Originally posted by Olio Olio wrote:

CR.
All of pros with clipper use Clipper CR (or CR WRB)


And the difference between CR and CR WRB is that WRB has a hollow handle right?

Do clippers go well with tenergies and revolution rubbers?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.422 seconds.

Become a Fan on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Web Wiz News
Forum Home | Go to the Forums | Forum Help | Disclaimer

MyTableTennis.NET is the trading name of Alex Table Tennis Ltd.

Copyright ©2003-2024 Alex Table Tennis Ltd. All rights reserved.