I hope DHS didn't neglect Skyline 2 with these new sponges 

Skyline 3.60 is imo the BEST china hybrid rubber on the market. It is maybe medium to medium+ hard which is great, speed is almost like a Tenergy and the spin is way over average. Great control and short game on the table, awesome while attacking close to it, a little bit lacking of power from half distance. But my ttr in America would way over 2000 and I am playing a 5ply blade so this means lacking of power in half distance, for somebody whos maybe not that good and allready plays a 7ply blade this rubber is fast especially for a unboosted china hybrid rubber! Of course compared to a boosted H3NP or a T05 its worse because these 2 rubbers are end of the line in tabe tennis, but its pretty close to good rubbers like Vega Pro, T64 and MX-P. Furthermore the rubber is getting attractive because it works without boosting and its sticky. Compared to H3.50 its simply faster and spinnier, H3.50 looses agianst it in every way.

I've recently switched to a Waldner Senso Carbon, so I've been going through my back catalog of rubbers to find a nice fit.  Big Dipper still works really well for me on the FH side (although newer sheets do feel a little harder than the older ones I had), so it was just a case of finding a decent BH rubber.  With this in mind, I gave S3-60 another crack, and it's really quite brilliant.

Downsides - spin-sensitive, especially in service return.  Needs a committed stroke to get good spin, which can take a bit of effort on the BH wing (good brush or big drive required, anything less is a safe shot but a bit toothless).  A bit heavy, but most things are these days.  Blade compatibility might be an issue for some.

I'll probably switch to this on the BH wing for my summer league season and see how it goes.  One big personal factor is that the slightly tacky nature of S3-60 helps me when switching between celluloid and plastic balls.  I can still play the same kind of game with any ball without worrying about grip on the ball, which will help a lot in a season where we might be using any type of ball on any given week.

It didn't sound like H3-50 was ever very well received, but did I hear a mention of H3-60 coming out? In my opinion, the original tinarc sponge was much better than the tinarc 3 sponge. 

H3-50 has LOTS of gears, but takes a lot of effort to get top speed out of it.  It's very linear and a bit slow.  I still like it as a FH option on fast blades, but I have big strokes on that wing so I get good results from it (it is tiring to use, however).

S3-60 has a big elastic feel, amazingly different to use when compared with H3-50.  You can get good kick on the ball with short strokes and it has a bit of the slingy feel you'd associate with softer eurojap rubbers.  Less linear and more bouncy though, obviously.  I've now ordered a medium/hard version to see if it would fit my FH needs as well.

I can see the logic in people wanting a comparison with the boosted Neo equivalent of each rubber, but care is needed.  The sponges on these DHS hybrids are softer and more flexible, which replicates some of the feel you get when you boost the Neos, but they lack the raw speed and top-end power.  With the hybrids you make looping easier and more variable (you can easily vary use of sponge and topsheet brush, like you would with a very grippy eurojap), but you sacrifice the hard sponge stability the Neos offer and loopkills and flat drives suffer.

These are compromise rubbers for sure.  If you grew up on rock-hard chinese sticky rubbers, you will probably miss that definite crunchy feel when hitting hard with these hybrids.  They do work much better as variable offense rubbers though, IMO.

About H3-60 - apparently XX was using this for a time on his BH (according to chatter on chinese forums, so apply with a pinch of salt).  Some of them have leaked out to the general public, but I haven't heard anything about an official release, which is a shame.  The #60 sponge does feel like a better bet than the #50.

More tiring is probably H3-50 - it's just slower overall and big shots come back more often.

Spin on big swings - I'd say H3-50 has more spin, or it's easier to produce spin in those situations.  I was surprised how different S3-60 was - it has a softer feel, bouncier sponge, and mine were noticeably less tacky than the H3-50 too.  S3-60 is very loud as well and I found it to have a lower arc.  

For me this all adds up to H3-50 being a more flexible, slower H3N (FH only for me) and S3-60 being more of a drive/hit/block rubber (with still enough tack for brushing, suited my BH more).

And all only on the bh side. 

h3-50 is rubbish rubber for bh .... not my choice .... to slow. 

but tg3-60 is the best ever ..... if someone says it has loud sound it is because he is only hitting flat. when you hit with loop it is very silent with huge amount of spin and speed with big arc.  

the rubber is the less tacky then h3. much faster ... not so sensitive to spin as h3. control is way beyond h3.

Tuning does not dome the sponge like on neo series. it just goes softer.

but the variety of wrist shots and gears are the best on tg3-60 ... this is clearly the winner for bh. 

What are differences in hardness? Dynamics? Speed?

I've heard that the 3-60 plays more like a boosted Neo? Is that right?