Joola Express One Review

Hello, i would like to have a review on this rubber(joola express one).
Important characteristics would be of course spin speed an control.
But if possible dont forget to mention how heavy or light  the rubber is  and how durable it is.
Thx

It is very  fast and hard, the topsheet is not grippy enough,...the topsheet  worn out quickly not very durable!!!

I used express 1 on my BH once time, good for offensive player, good speed, good feel, easy to loop with. But durability is a question mark. My only last for 2 weeks and look like 6 moths old rubber.

25

Talent wrote: I�d also be interested in a comparison between joola express one and tenergy 05!

  05 is so much spinnier than Express One.  Actually Express One plays sort of like Tenergy 64, but harder.

I found that 64 is good for mid distance play if combine if andro kinetic explorer may be generally can say to all OFF+ blade.

danhs wrote: rossicarbon wrote: It is very  fast and hard, the topsheet is not grippy enough,...the topsheet  worn out quickly not very durable!!! i bought a  sheet  and used it for 30mins took it off and gave it to my coach!!!... never come bakc to that ruber, such a dissapointment!! :-(   If you hit very hard and really get into the sponge you can get good spin.  It's like people used to say about regular Bryce, it's a one shot(loopkill) rubber.   Actually a friend of mine has it on his forehand with Bryce on the backhand and the Bryce is way more forgiving with better spin on slow loops, pushes,etc.

Hello, i would like to have a review on this rubber(joola express one).

Alright, i give you a brief impression of One 1.8 on OC:

�weight: light to medium-light. �hardness: sponge hard, topsheet soft. Quite the opposite to the Boosts. Overall it plays softer than Tenergy 05. If you want a hard sheet go for Roxon 500. �throw & touch: much lower than Nimbus or Tenergy. This is much easier to handle on a high-throw blade (elastic blade) as OC. On a stiff low-throw blade you may find the opposite. The touch is linear and direct. �service-return & push: safe; not sensible to incoming spin; can drop the ball short behind the net. �topspin & spin: more spin than Nimbus, but Nimbus had near to no spin anyways. Much less than Tenergy 05. �drive & hit: great. Hit the ball frontally, that is the main feature of this rubber. �power, speed, etc.: I don't have to write much about this. One is a power rubber as Nimbus. you won't miss speed. �durability: bad, typical ESN. �summary: a better Nimbus in every way. Nimbus was a hitters delight. This is the upgrade: better spin, lower throw, better to handle, though still bad durability. As Nimbus you can frontally drive the ball, a thing which is difficult with Tenergy 05. But if you mainly loop and scarcely drive or hit, then you better go with Tenergy 05.

Price is pretty standard, i think you can get it new for about 30� on eBay. I bought it used on eBay for about 12�.